“Poland is a sovereign country, no one can choose our authorities. Unfortunately, such violations of our sovereignty have already occurred several times,” said Tomasz Sakiewicz today on the program “Political Coffee.” The editor-in-chief of Gazeta Polska pointed to shocking mechanisms of electoral engineering that were allegedly used in 2023. This is indicated both by alarming findings mentioned in the dissenting opinion to the Supreme Court’s resolution and by the latest report of the U.S. Congress.
In Sunday’s edition of “Political Coffee” on TV Republika, the topic of external pressure that led to a change of authorities in Poland more than two years ago was discussed. Tomasz Sakiewicz directly pointed to a coordinated action aimed at overthrowing the government of the United Right.
“Poland is a sovereign country, no one can choose our authorities. Unfortunately, such violations of our sovereignty have already occurred several times, including through the overthrow of Mateusz Morawiecki’s government, also with the use of the American embassy,” stated the editor-in-chief of TV Republika.
A key moment of the program was a statement concerning digital tools that allegedly influenced the election result.
“There is material showing that during the 2023 elections, servers located in Cyprus were directing the movement of buses transporting voters to various polling stations. This was probably action under the influence of the European Union. We will investigate this matter,” announced Sakiewicz.
What was hidden in the Supreme Court resolution?
The words about “servers in Cyprus” are not merely a journalistic metaphor. They refer to a specific legal document – the resolution of the Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber of the Supreme Court of 11 January 2024 (case file I NSW 1237/23), declaring the elections valid. Although the Court upheld the validity of the elections, the resolution included a dissenting opinion by Supreme Court Justice Paweł Czubik, who pointed to a dangerous precedent.
In his votum separatum, Justice Czubik described the mechanism of so-called electoral tourism, controlled by algorithms. This concerned websites that, on election day, instructed voters of the then opposition which districts they should go to so that their vote would carry the greatest weight and take seats away from Law and Justice (PiS).
As we read in Justice Czubik’s dissent, these portals operated “incidentally on servers in foreign states – member states of the EU.” According to our information – this includes Cyprus. These tools “made it possible to optimize the vote of a voter casting a ballot on the basis of a certificate of the right to vote by voting in a specific district.”
The Supreme Court justice warned at the time that this practice concerned only “three electoral lists (electoral committees of parties that, defining themselves at the time as ‘democratic,’ now, as the ruling coalition, pursue policies far removed from the declared standards of the rule of law).” The document mentions specific locations of digital infrastructure:
“There is no basis to claim that acting in this way, even from the territory of a foreign state, constituted a violation of the applicable provisions of the Electoral Code (paradoxically even if this server were located not in Luxembourg or Cyprus, but in Russia and controlled from there (…)),” wrote Justice Czubik, indicating that this mechanism allowed the current December 13 coalition to obtain “‘excess’ seats.”
U.S. report: Brussels censored Poles
Tomasz Sakiewicz’s thesis about “acting under the influence of the European Union” is confirmed by a report published on 3 February 2026 by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee titled “The Foreign Censorship Threat.” The document reveals how EU bureaucrats, using the Digital Services Act (DSA), forced tech giants to censor political content.
The American investigation shows that the European Commission regularly “interfered in the national elections of EU member states.” The report explicitly states that platforms such as TikTok and Facebook changed their rules at Brussels’ behest, censoring content deemed “hate speech” or “disinformation.” In practice, this meant silencing conservative voices and those skeptical of the EU’s climate or migration policies.
The report points to the existence of “Rapid Response Systems,” under which trusted entities (often left-wing NGOs) could, on a priority basis, demand the removal of content inconvenient for the establishment during election campaigns – also in Poland in 2023.
Millions from Biden for a “change of government”
The head of TV Republika also recalled the American thread, speaking about interference “with the use of the American embassy.” This issue has been repeatedly described by Gazeta Polska. It concerns the actions of the Joe Biden administration and the agency USAID (United States Agency for International Development), which, under the slogans of “strengthening democracy,” pumped millions of dollars into Polish NGOs.
These funds went to foundations and associations that, in the election year, conducted aggressive voter turnout campaigns targeted at specific groups of the electorate (including young people and women in large cities), favorable to the then opposition. American taxpayer money supported initiatives linked to the circles of Donald Tusk and Rafał Trzaskowski, which in practice meant foreign financing of one side’s election campaign in the political dispute.