The government and its subordinate special services are reportedly considering the option of “re-granting Sławomir Cenckiewicz access to classified information,” writes Friday’s edition of Rzeczpospolita. The head of the National Security Bureau (BBN) corrects the record: “No one from the government needs to ‘grant’ me access to secrets, as it was restored by a court ruling on June 17 of this year.” A clear statement was also issued regarding the alleged “game” between the President’s Chancellery and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
In Friday’s issue of Rz, a suggestion is made that a peculiar bargain may soon take place between the Chancellery of the Prime Minister and the President’s Chancellery.
“In the government and its subordinate special services, the option of re-granting Cenckiewicz access to classified information is being considered. Can the head of the BBN expect a gesture encouraging cooperation?”
reports Jacek Nizinkiewicz.
He suggests that in exchange for “letting go” of the head of the BBN, President Karol Nawrocki would agree to certain ambassadorial nominations, including those of Bogdan Klich and Ryszard Schnepf.
The head of the BBN reacted to the Rz article before 8 a.m. He denied any talk of a “broader game between the Presidential Palace and the MFA.”
“Poland is not a marketplace and a feeding ground for the drunks from SKW and FSB in Kadyny, but a sacred entity and a place of respect for the law!” emphasizes Cenckiewicz.
He recalls the president’s declaration that “Bogdan Klich will never be the Polish ambassador to Washington.”
“My case,” although already resolved by the court and under administrative procedure regulations, is not worth such haggling, for Poland, it is important that in Washington there be an ambassador of the Republic of Poland who does not insult or verbally abuse the President of the United States, and thus enjoys a serious political standing,”
stresses the head of the BBN.
Referring to the matter of access to secrets, he reminds that no one from the government needs to “re-grant” it, because it was restored by the June 17 ruling.
“The government can always withdraw its cassation appeal against the aforementioned ruling, but in doing so it would admit to breaking the law itself,”
the statement reads.